© Brighteon.com All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Brighteon is not responsible for comments and content uploaded by our users.
This channel has partnered with the Brighteon Store and receives a small commission from all sales generated from an affiliate link.
Click the shop now button below to help out this channel.
Watch P.2 here: https://www.brighteon.com/db4ac835-17ca-42bc-93bd-59d8dd9419cc
Watch P.3 here: https://www.brighteon.com/20b50232-38ba-4eb1-adcb-025540db9892Disclaimer: I am not giving medical advice, I am not medically qualified; do your own research, own your own actions whether by omission or commission.
John Flint, to his credit, reports two sides of the ‘to mask or not to mask’ issue in Western Australian health settings, in this page 9 article in the Sunday Times, Western Australia, March 26th 2023 edition. However, he lets himself and the rest of us down by omitting to add a few salient points for the scientific research into mask effectiveness to examine, if only to nudge the curiosity of the reader towards objectivity and common sense. Oh, and by the way, no surprise, John Flint neglects to mention that he implicitly backed the mask-wearing enforcement all the way through the heavy-handed Covid-19 measures of the past three years.
Note: I am expressing my opinions, and my recollections may be faulty, my assessments may be invalid, especially when I question the motives of Joe Spagnolo, Dr Andrew Miller, Dr Andy Robertson, John Flint, and others, including organisations, such as WA Health, the AMA, and others.





