© Brighteon.com All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Brighteon is not responsible for comments and content uploaded by our users.
Dr. Sam Bailey: The Myth of "Safe and Effective"
837 followers
Follow
0
Share
Report
103 views • 12/18/2021
Dr. Sam Bailey: The Myth of "Safe and Effective"
"Safe & Effective" - now where have we heard that before?
Let's dive into another pharmaceutical experiment and see how it affected future generations.
References:
1. Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs, 2013: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_comments/2015/09/00062-97081.pdf
2. Leon Goldberg: Creator of DES (Diethylstilbestrol): https://www.asmalldoseoftoxicology.org/blog/2018/2/7/leon-goldberg-creator-of-des-diethylstilbestrol
3. Diethylstilbestrol (DES) in the US: https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/diethylstilbestrol-des-us
4. Gynaecomastia in Stilboestrol workers, 1944: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1035620/pdf/brjindmed00272-0029.pdf
5. Robert Meyers - D.E.S., the bitter pill, 1983: https://archive.org/details/desbitterpill00meye
6. Diana Dutton - Worse than the disease : pitfalls of medical progress, 1988: https://archive.org/details/worsethandisease0000dutt (Excellent overview of the DES story in the US)
7. Diethylstilbestrol (DES): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diethylstilbestrol#History
8. Elmer Louis Severinghaus Papers: https://search.amphilsoc.
"Safe and effective" is the mantra we hear regarding the experimental gene therapy jabs marketed as a "vaccine," at the same time ignoring the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. VAERS while under reported by a factor of 31-41 clearly shows "safe and effective" is more like dangerous and destructive. Since the alleged virus was never isolated, purified and characterized thereby proving it's existence, why do we need a fake "vaccine?" Now we have the sheep bragging about receiving their "Booster" jab, competely oblivious to the fact that if the jab were actually effective at what it's purported to do, then why the need for a "booster?" It just never occurs to them "boosting" a non-effective jabs 1 & 2 with a non-effective "booster" = non-effective and exposes them to higher risk.
Dr. Sam, thank you for your videos which thoughtfully address topics.
source:
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-myth-of-safe-and-effective:0
"Safe & Effective" - now where have we heard that before?
Let's dive into another pharmaceutical experiment and see how it affected future generations.
References:
1. Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs, 2013: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_comments/2015/09/00062-97081.pdf
2. Leon Goldberg: Creator of DES (Diethylstilbestrol): https://www.asmalldoseoftoxicology.org/blog/2018/2/7/leon-goldberg-creator-of-des-diethylstilbestrol
3. Diethylstilbestrol (DES) in the US: https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/diethylstilbestrol-des-us
4. Gynaecomastia in Stilboestrol workers, 1944: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1035620/pdf/brjindmed00272-0029.pdf
5. Robert Meyers - D.E.S., the bitter pill, 1983: https://archive.org/details/desbitterpill00meye
6. Diana Dutton - Worse than the disease : pitfalls of medical progress, 1988: https://archive.org/details/worsethandisease0000dutt (Excellent overview of the DES story in the US)
7. Diethylstilbestrol (DES): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diethylstilbestrol#History
8. Elmer Louis Severinghaus Papers: https://search.amphilsoc.
"Safe and effective" is the mantra we hear regarding the experimental gene therapy jabs marketed as a "vaccine," at the same time ignoring the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. VAERS while under reported by a factor of 31-41 clearly shows "safe and effective" is more like dangerous and destructive. Since the alleged virus was never isolated, purified and characterized thereby proving it's existence, why do we need a fake "vaccine?" Now we have the sheep bragging about receiving their "Booster" jab, competely oblivious to the fact that if the jab were actually effective at what it's purported to do, then why the need for a "booster?" It just never occurs to them "boosting" a non-effective jabs 1 & 2 with a non-effective "booster" = non-effective and exposes them to higher risk.
Dr. Sam, thank you for your videos which thoughtfully address topics.
source:
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-myth-of-safe-and-effective:0
Keywords
FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world
Get FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world that are usually blacklisted by YouTube, Facebook, Google, Twitter and Vimeo. Watch documentaries the techno-fascists don't want you to know even exist. Join the free Brighteon email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time. 100% privacy protected.
Your privacy is protected. Subscription confirmation required.





