THIS WAS A KIDNAPPING BECAUSE MR. TAEBEL WAS NOT RELEASED ON BAIL AS THE EIGTH AMENDMENT OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION REQUIRES AND IF IT WASN'T A KIDNAPPING HE WOULD HAVE BEEN RELEASED. MR. TAEBEL HAD MADE A 15 MINUTE LECTURE VIDEO ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION AND EXCESSIVE GOVERNMENT AND HAD FILED SEVERAL LAWSUITS AGAINST OFFICIALS AND THEREFORE HAD A VERY REASONABLE BELIEF HE WAS BEING KIDNAPPED WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS AN INTENTIONAL KIDNAPPING WHICH IS ALL THE LAW REQUIRES IN ORDER TO UTILIZE SELF DEFENSE.