What Montana is doing to stop the surveillance state.

Adding, terrible news: (more here at link, first read below though)

https://cbs4local.com/news/nation-world/pensacola-police-chief-says-federal-ruling-protecting-ai-child-porn-got-it-wrong-09-02-2026

Child porn approved in US as long as it's AI

Private possession of images or videos of child sex abuse made using artificial intelligence is protected by the First Amendment in the United States, ruled the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

😞The protection is valid only if the material does not portray a real person and remains in the home.

The judges based their decision on previous rulings that established that:

🔴 An individual has the right to possess obscene materials in the privacy of his or her home

🔴 ‘Virtual’ child sexual abuse materials that do not depict a real person are not considered child pornography

In the ruling, Judge John Z. Lee also urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the matter of AI-generated child sex abuse content, pointing at the problems created by the existing legal precedents.

“Given the relentless advancement in artificial intelligence models, we have some concerns about the lines these cases draw, but we are not free to redraw them ourselves,” the judge warned.

News of the ruling left many social media users unamused about what they regard as the legalization of child porn or at least one of its forms.

Some also argued that AI-generated content is not real and thus there are no victims, prompting others to retort that child porn is child porn, no matter how it was generated.

🤔And yet others raised another valid question: exactly how does AI learn to generate such content? Could it be that images of real children posted online are scraped and used as ingredients for product pedos use for their amusement?

Is AI-generated child porn really OK if no real children are harmed or involved in its production? Or should this potential loophole for pedophiles be shut down as soon as possible?

@geopolitics_prime