© Brighteon.com All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Brighteon is not responsible for comments and content uploaded by our users.
NASA, Taxes and the Value of Space Exploration - An Answer to Neil Degrasse Tyson
1933 followers
Follow
0
Download MP3
Share
Report
1 view • February 15, 2021
0:32 - Famous contemporary astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson claims that government is necessary for space exploration, because private investors need more knowledge of the benefits and risks before they'll be willing to embark on a new frontier. In his own words, "Private enterprise, in the history of civilization, has never led large, expensive, dangerous projects with unknown risks... because when you combine all these factors, you cannot create a capital market valuation of that activity." He goes on to cite various past explorations led by governments that were later followed by businessmen who merely capitalized on opportunities already discovered.
I know that free market advocates need not have all the answers to how things would go in a free society, but where do you think his analysis about the necessity of government goes wrong? How might you suppose dangerous explorations would be carried out without government, when there is no observable economic incentive to do so?
13:20 - What is Stefan's opinion on the relation of protection of property rights and economic development/growth? According to many economists, a well-defined and strongly protected property rights are the key to economic development.
21:30 - In a stateless society, how do you see the reasonably probable incentive to monopolize the market, or in other words, incentive to secure access to maximum amount of target resources and market share available in order to protect future profits and accumulation of wealth, not to effect negatively on the overall freedom of individuals on a certain geographical territory with the passage of time? What is the discouragement for a certain group of individuals to privatize resources, from water, minerals to arable land, secure them with private security forces, and bully diminishing, financially weak and dispersed smaller actors in the market into disappearing. Is it reasonable to expect from consumers to punish such behavior, if the growing soon-to-be-monopolist is offering the best price for a certain product, has the best access to resources necessary to produce that specific product, and has the finances to pay for the best regulations-free market?
Freedomain Radio is 100% funded by viewers like you. Please support the show by signing up for a monthly subscription or making a one time donation at: http://www.fdrurl.com/donate
Bitcoin Address: 1Fd8RuZqJNG4v56rPD1v6rgYptwnHeJRWs
Litecoin Address: LL76SbNek3dT8bv2APZNhWgNv3nHEzAgKT
Get more from Stefan Molyneux and Freedomain Radio including books, podcasts and other info at: http://www.freedomainradio.com
Amazon US Affiliate Link: www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUS
Amazon Canada Affiliate Link: www.fdrurl.com/AmazonCanada
Amazon UK Affiliate Link: www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUK
Freedomain Radio Facebook: http://www.fdrurl.com/fb
Freedomain Radio Twitter: https://twitter.com/freedomainradio
Freedomain Radio Google+: http://www.fdrurl.com/google
Freedomain Radio LinkedIn: http://www.fdrurl.com/LinkedIn
I know that free market advocates need not have all the answers to how things would go in a free society, but where do you think his analysis about the necessity of government goes wrong? How might you suppose dangerous explorations would be carried out without government, when there is no observable economic incentive to do so?
13:20 - What is Stefan's opinion on the relation of protection of property rights and economic development/growth? According to many economists, a well-defined and strongly protected property rights are the key to economic development.
21:30 - In a stateless society, how do you see the reasonably probable incentive to monopolize the market, or in other words, incentive to secure access to maximum amount of target resources and market share available in order to protect future profits and accumulation of wealth, not to effect negatively on the overall freedom of individuals on a certain geographical territory with the passage of time? What is the discouragement for a certain group of individuals to privatize resources, from water, minerals to arable land, secure them with private security forces, and bully diminishing, financially weak and dispersed smaller actors in the market into disappearing. Is it reasonable to expect from consumers to punish such behavior, if the growing soon-to-be-monopolist is offering the best price for a certain product, has the best access to resources necessary to produce that specific product, and has the finances to pay for the best regulations-free market?
Freedomain Radio is 100% funded by viewers like you. Please support the show by signing up for a monthly subscription or making a one time donation at: http://www.fdrurl.com/donate
Bitcoin Address: 1Fd8RuZqJNG4v56rPD1v6rgYptwnHeJRWs
Litecoin Address: LL76SbNek3dT8bv2APZNhWgNv3nHEzAgKT
Get more from Stefan Molyneux and Freedomain Radio including books, podcasts and other info at: http://www.freedomainradio.com
Amazon US Affiliate Link: www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUS
Amazon Canada Affiliate Link: www.fdrurl.com/AmazonCanada
Amazon UK Affiliate Link: www.fdrurl.com/AmazonUK
Freedomain Radio Facebook: http://www.fdrurl.com/fb
Freedomain Radio Twitter: https://twitter.com/freedomainradio
Freedomain Radio Google+: http://www.fdrurl.com/google
Freedomain Radio LinkedIn: http://www.fdrurl.com/LinkedIn
Keywords
FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world
Get FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world that are usually blacklisted by YouTube, Facebook, Google, Twitter and Vimeo. Watch documentaries the techno-fascists don't want you to know even exist. Join the free Brighteon email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time. 100% privacy protected.
Your privacy is protected. Subscription confirmation required.





