Why do globe earth theory proponents ALWAYS lose in a debate?
Ioftheneedle
159 followers
Follow
0
48 views • 9 months ago

…. Whether it’s the average Joe or someone who considers himself a high IQ food scientist, they don’t stand a chance in any type of heliocentric vs geocentric, debate, even when matched up with a debater from the geocentric side that only has a cursory understanding of the facts… even a weak geocentric debater can easily smoke the most sophisticated, intellectual, heliocentric earth model debater, as in “minced meat”, the globe earth theory proponent comes out the loser every time.  
Why is that?  Because globe earth theory is an absurd ridiculous notion that not one person would ever believe, if they weren’t brainwashed from birth to believe it.  I mean, it’s not even a good lie, it’s the type of lie that a psychopath would try to sell to third graders, it’s shear pie in the sky fantasy land stuff, preposterous on it’s face.  
Yet the food scientist types desperately cling to NASA induced fairytales and all the hogwash that comes with it, as they playfully contemplate which prehistoric dinosaur, is their very favorite, hoping deep down inside, that a dinosaur unicorn, will someday be discovered, for this would be their most favorite-est dinosaur of all.

And the worst part is, the food scientist guy I’m familiar with, has zero interest in looking at the overwhelming empirical scientific evidence that proves he’s a brainwashed dupe. Will he literally end up being the very last one to know?  Will even Democrats, who know absolutely Jack shit about anything and everything, know this truth before this food scientist guy does?  It’s looking that way.  The guy is actually proud to be so God damn stupid.  We’re talking about a guy who brags about how he doesn’t think the 1986 Challenger crew are alive and well, despite massive proof to the contrary, he’d rather believe they all had undocumented birth twins,with the exact same names, as their twin siblings.  He doesn’t want to see the evidence, he just wants to be sure that he somehow knows better than what the hard evidence shows, as he points out the craziness of such a conspiracy theory, that he says happened in the 1970’s, not 1986, which just goes to show he doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about. Surprise surprise. 
These food scientist types, don’t want to be helped, they instinctively bite the hand that tries to show them the proof.  So what can one do?  Well, you just have to let the guy be dumber than a bag of rocks… a bag of rocks isn’t going listen to no body, because of course, rocks don’t have ears.
Don’t look to any food scientist for answers, not beyond the everyday mundane, he’s just not going to have a clue, and he will sure as hell, lead you astray, like with the notion of someday being able to terra-form Mars, to create a viable atmosphere for humans.  If it wasn’t so pitiful and disgusting, it would be funny. 

Keywords
FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world
Get FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world that are usually blacklisted by YouTube, Facebook, Google, Twitter and Vimeo. Watch documentaries the techno-fascists don't want you to know even exist. Join the free Brighteon email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time. 100% privacy protected.
Your privacy is protected. Subscription confirmation required.