Support Your Freedom to Speak:
Stare Decisis: Precedent vs the Constitution
channel image
Tenth Amendment Center
336 Subscribers
2 views
Published 4 years ago
As the founders widely understood, the Constitution is supreme. And it remains supreme even if the opinion of the Supreme Court contradicts it.

If you believe, like I do, that all these judges take an oath to the Constitution - rather than an oath to precedent - and their oath requires them to issue opinions based on the original, legal meaning of the Constitution - then the doctrine of stare decisis is unconstitutional even if the Supreme Court disagrees.

JOIN TAC: https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/
Keywords
libertypoliticsconstitutionsupreme courtlawlibertariancourtsfounders10th amendmentstare decisis

FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world

Get FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world that are usually blacklisted by YouTube, Facebook, Google, Twitter and Vimeo. Watch documentaries the techno-fascists don't want you to know even exist. Join the free Brighteon email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time. 100% privacy protected.

Your privacy is protected. Subscription confirmation required.