MARSH V ALABAMA; SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP UNCONSTITUTIONAL
3 views
•
Published 5 years ago
•
Privately owned corporations, open to the public, cannot discriminate by denying constitutionally protected speech.
“Ownership does not always mean absolute dominion.”
The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.
In order to enable the public to be properly informed, their information must be uncensored.
“Ownership does not always mean absolute dominion.”
The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.
In order to enable the public to be properly informed, their information must be uncensored.
Keywords
constitutioncommunismsocialismdemocracyrepublic
FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world
Get FREE email alerts of the most important BANNED videos in the world that are usually blacklisted by YouTube, Facebook, Google, Twitter and Vimeo. Watch documentaries the techno-fascists don't want you to know even exist. Join the free Brighteon email newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time. 100% privacy protected.
Your privacy is protected. Subscription confirmation required.
Related videos